{"id":5166,"date":"2016-12-21T10:31:32","date_gmt":"2016-12-21T10:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/?page_id=5166"},"modified":"2016-12-21T10:31:32","modified_gmt":"2016-12-21T10:31:32","slug":"selection-process","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/5156-2\/selection-process\/","title":{"rendered":"Selection process"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #008080;\">[<a style=\"color: #008080;\" href=\"#English\">English version HERE<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Procesul de Peer Review<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.\u00a0PROCESUL DE PEER REVIEW: STANDARDE SI DESCRIERE<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.1.\u00a0EVALUAREA EDITORIALA<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In primul stadiu al evaluarii,\u00a0lucrarea propusa spre evaluare este\u00a0examinata din punct de vedere tehnic si administrativ. Evaluarea este realizata de catre editorul\u00a0responsabil,\u00a0pentru a identifica daca articolul\u00a0se pliaza specificului jurnalului\u00a0si daca tema articolului este in legatura directa cu tema volumului in care se doreste a fi incadrat. Editorul va verifica daca autorul a respectat cerintele editoriale, precum sistemul de citare, respectarea parametrilor tehnici ai jurnalului conforme cu template-ul disponibil online, sau strucuta articolului.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Numai dupa ce\u00a0cerintele tehnice au fost indeplinite de catre autor, articolul va intra in procesul de peer review unde calitatea stiintifica a articolului va fi evaluata. Dupa ce articolele sunt analizate pentru a se vedea potrivirea orientarii disiplinare\u00a0si tematica cu\u00a0standardele de calitate ale editorialului\u00a0de publicare LUMEN, textele sau abstractele si fragmente semnificative\u00a0sunt trimise catre doi referenti stiintifici, selectati din Comisia de Referenti a\u00a0LUMEN Publishing House, a caror activitate si expertiza stiintifica corespunde cu textul propus.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.2. EVALUAREA STIINTIFICA<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Dupa ce textele sunt analizate din punct de vedere stiintific, referintii stiintifici comunica decizia si observatiile\/ cerintele (daca este cazul) ca si conditie pentru \u00a0realizarea publicarii. Editorul transmite catre autor decizia luata de catre referenti si in cazul in care referentii au ajuns de comun acord pentru acceptarea la publicarea dar au recomandat sa fie realizate modificari in text, textul este trimis inapoi catre autori pentru a realiza schimbarile necesare. Dupa ce schimbarile cerute au fost realizate, textul ajunge din nou la cei doi referenti ai\u00a0LUMEN Publishing House Committee pentru realizarea unei verificari finale, precedata de transmiterea deciziei lor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Evaluarea stiintifica este realizatata in cel putin in unul dintre urmatoarele moduri, in functie de caracteristicile programului:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">PEER REVIEW &#8220;ORB&#8221;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Acest proces consta in inmanarea unui manuscript (fara nicio data de identificarea a autorului\/ autorilor) catre un referent a carui identitate nu este cunoscuta de catre autorul a carui lucrare este subiectul evaluarii si nici nu va fi cunoscut de catre autor dupa finalizarea evaluarii. Comunicarea dintre referent\/i si autor\/i va fi mediata de catre editura &#8211; LUMEN Publishing House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Rezultatele evaluarii pot fi de genul: <strong>acceptare, acceptare cu modificari si respingere.<\/strong> Daca un referent respinge un manuscript\/ text dar celalat referent il accepta, textul este evaluat de un al treilea referent sau decatre editorul responsabil de volumul\/numarul in cauza\u00a0&#8211; care va\u00a0lua decizia finala. In cazul in care textul este acceptat cu modificari, autorului ii vor fi solicitate schimbarile necesare.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">REFERENTI PROPUSI DE CATRE AUTORI<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Autorii sunt invitati\u00a0sa propuna\u00a0proprii lor referenti de specialitate atunci cand trimit articolul lor spre publicare. Referentii pot fi coordonatori de teze de doctorat etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Opinia referentilor propusi de catre autor va fi luata in considerare,\u00a0in cazul in care va exista o neconcordanta intre cele doua\u00a0evaluarii ale referentilor\u00a0LUMEN Publishing, sau in cazul in care referentii accepta lucrarile cu anumite retineri. Acesta metoda este utilizata si ca o metoda aditionala de peer review, in cazul unor programe care o solicita.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.3. EVALUAREA ETICA, IDENTIFICAREA SI GESTIONAREA ACUZATIILOR CU PRIVILE LA INCALCARILE ETICE<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Evaluarea etica\u00a0are in vedere doua directii, Etica Editorialului si Etica Cercetarii.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In privinta Eticii Editorialului, sunt analizate suspiciunile de plagiarism si asumarea necorespunzatoare a drepturilor de autor (autori care au contribuit la text sau la cercetare si excluderea autorilor care au adus contributii\u00a0lucarii in discutie). Sunt urmarite pentru a fi depistate si conflictele de interes\u00a0care pot aparea dupa publicarea de catre LUMEN, dreptul de a reproduce imagini, text sau drepturile de republicare\u00a0a fragmentelor. Este urmarita evitarea solicit\u0103rilor de finan\u021bare dubl\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd volumul este finan\u021bat din fonduri publice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">A doua directie are scopul de a evalua respectarea regulilor etice\u00a0ale cercetarii stiintifice:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">normele de confidentialitate ale datelor,<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">obtinerea consimtamantului persoanei\/ persoanelor\u00a0intervievate\u00a0 sau\u00a0care au participat la cercetarea\u00a0din articolul in cauza,<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00a0protectia drepturilor participantilor\u00a0la cercetare, cu scopul de a nu incalca niciun drept\u00a0dat prin lege.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.4. REVIEW EDITORIAL al TRADUCERILOR<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Review-ul editorial al traducerilor vizeaza calitatea traducerilor\u00a0in limba romana. Un specialist realizeaza evaluarea, un cunoscator\u00a0al limbii in care cartea apare sau un vorbitor nativ,\u00a0astfel fiind verificata calitatea traducerii.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.5. Platforma\u00a0LUMEN Submission<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Pentru a putea imbunatati calitatea sistemului de management al\u00a0lucrarilor si a procesului de peer review, LUMEN Publishing House a implementat, din iulie 2012,\u00a0<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a style=\"color: #000000; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"http:\/\/edituralumen.ro\/submission\/openconf.php\" target=\"_blank\">LUMEN Submission Platform<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a style=\"color: #000000; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"http:\/\/edituralumen.ro\/submission\/openconf.php\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">LUMEN Submission Platform<\/span> <\/a><\/span>este o platforma\u00a0de imbunatatire a sistemului de management al\u00a0lucrarilor si al procesului de peer review care faciliteaza\u00a0trimiterea articolelor de catre autori si procesul de peer review condus de catre referenti. Software-ul este flexibil si poate fi utilizat, atat in trimitere cat si in\u00a0management, pentru toate programele (publicare de carte, jurnale stiintifice si conferinte).<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">II. DREPTURILE DE AUTOR SI RESPONSABILITATEA AUTORULUI<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Autorii asigura editorul, in momentul semnarii contarctului si prin trimiterea versiunii finale a textului, ca ea\/el detine toate drepturile de autor pentru tabele, imagini etc. inclusiv continutul textului\/ volumului si declara in mod clar ca ea\/el isi asuma responsabilitatea pentru existenta drepturilor de autor a intregului continut propus spre publicare\u00a0 si toti co-autorii.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Pentru publicare, acolo unde este necesar,\u00a0se poate apela la indrumarea Comitetului de Etica al\u00a0LUMEN Publishing House, atat cu privire la etica editorialului, cat si etica cercetarii cu subiecti umani.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">III. SELECTIA SI ACCEPTAREA REFERENTILOR<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Referentii\u00a0LUMEN Publishing sunt personalitati stiintifice si culturale, recunoscute national si international si detin un titlu de Doctor in Stiinte; in cazuri exceptionale\u00a0poate fi vorba si de un student la doctorat.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Acesti referenti trebuie sa aiba o bogata expertiza\u00a0si experienta pentru a fi alesi ca si referenti, autentificati prin publicatii, conferinte, granturi etc. si au lucrat anterior pentru\u00a0LUMEN Publishing si \u00a0LUMEN Research Center in Social and Humanistic Sciences.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008080;\">[<a style=\"color: #008080;\" name=\"English\"><\/a>English version HERE]<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Peer Review Process<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.\u00a0PEER REVIEW PROCESS:\u00a0STANDARDS\u00a0AND DESCRIPTION<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.1.\u00a0EDITORIAL EVALUATION<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is the first stage evaluation, in which the paper proposed for evaluation is assessed from the technical and administrative points of view. The evaluation is made by the editor in charge with the issue following, to identify whether the paper is related to the specificity of the journal and if it addresses subjects that are in direct connection with the current issue\u2019s topic. The editor in charge will also assess if the author complies with the editorial requirements, such as the citation system, respecting the journal\u2019s technical parameters\u00a0from the template available online, or the structure of the article.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Only after the technical requirements are fulfilled by the author will the paper be the subject of the peer review process and its scientific quality evaluated. \u00a0After texts are analysed to see if they match the disciplinary and thematic orientation of the publication\u2019s \u00a0editorial quality standards of LUMEN publications, text or abstracts and significant fragments are sent to two reviewers selected from the Board of Reviewers of LUMEN Publishing House, whose scientific activity and expertise corresponds most with the proposed text.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.2. SCIENTIFIC EVALUATION<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">After texts are analysed from the scientific point of view, reviewers\u00a0communicate their decision and the observations\/requirements (if any) as a condition of publication. The editor in charge transmits\u00a0the reviewers\u2019 decision to the author and, if the reviewers\u00a0are agreed on the acceptance for publication but recommend changes of the text, it is sent back to the author to make changes. Once the requested changes are made, the text returns to the two reviewers of LUMEN Publishing House Committee to check the final version of the text and transmit their decision.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The scientific evaluation is completed in at least one of the following ways, depending upon the feature of the programme:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">BLIND PEER REVIEW<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The blind peer review process consists of assigning a blind manuscript (with no identification information of the author\/s) \u00a0to a reviewer whose identity is not known to the author whose paper is subject to evaluation, nor will be known by the author after the evaluation is completed. The correspondence between the reviewers\/s and the author\/s will be intermediated by the publisher \u2013 LUMEN Publishing House.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The results of evaluation can be of the following types:\u00a0<strong>acceptance, acceptance with modifications or rejected<\/strong>. If a reviewer rejects the manuscript but another one accepts it, the manuscript\u00a0is assessed by a third reviewer, or the editor responsible for the issue, who will accomplish the advocate function and take the final decision. If it is accepted with modifications, corrections will be asked for from the author.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">REVIEWERS PROPOSED BY AUTHORS<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Authors are invited to propose their own specialty referrers when they submit their paper for publication. They can be coordinators of doctoral theses, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The opinions of the authors\u2019 proposed reviewers will be considered, in the event of a disagreement between the two peer reviewers proposed by LUMEN Publishing, or where peer reviewers accept papers with a reserve. Also, this method is used as an additional\u00a0editorial peer review, in the case of programmes that request it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.3. ETHICAL EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF, AND DEALING WITH ALLEGATIONS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Ethical evaluation follows two directions, namely Editorial Ethics and\u00a0Research Ethics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Regarding Editorial Ethics, these are analysed suspicions of plagiarism and the improper award of authorship (including authors who contributed to the text or research and the exclusion of authors who have contributed). They also track potential conflicts of interest that occurred after publication by LUMEN, the rights to reproduce images, text or republication rights fragments where appropriate. It is followed the avoidance of double funding requests when the volume of publicly-funded appearance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The second direction aims of evaluation for respecting the ethical rules of scientific research where appropriate<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">the rules of data confidentiality<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">obtaining the agreement of person\/ persons interviewed or for which you have undertaken research included in the volume<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">in the protection of the interests of natural or legal persons, in order not to violate any image or other rights of nature provided by law<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.4. EDITORIAL REVIEW of TRANSLATIONS<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Editorial reviewers of translation exclusively target the quality of translations in Romanian. An evaluation is undertaken by a specialist, a connoisseur of the language in which the book appeared or a native speaker and the quality of translation is checked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I.5. LUMEN Submission Platform<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In order to improve the quality management system of works and peer reviews, LUMEN Publishing House has implemented, since July 2012, the\u00a0<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/edituralumen.ro\/submission\/openconf.php\" target=\"_blank\">LUMEN Submission Platform<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The\u00a0<a style=\"color: #000000;\" href=\"http:\/\/edituralumen.ro\/submission\/openconf.php\" target=\"_blank\">LUMEN Submission Platform<\/a>\u00a0is a management system platform\u00a0of works and peer reviews that facilitates the submission of works by authors and the peer review process conducted by reviewers. The software is flexible and can be used in both work and management across all referents\u00a0within all programmes (book publishing, scientific journals, and conferences).<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">II. COPYRIGHT AND AUTHOR RESPONSIBILITY<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Authors assure the publisher, at the\u00a0moment of\u00a0signing the contract and sending the final version of the volume, that he\/she holds all the copyrights to tables, images etc., including the content in the volume and declares expressly that he\/she assumes full responsibility for the existence of the copyright of the entire contents of the proposed publication and all co-authors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For publication, where necessary, it seeks the advice of the Ethics Committees of\u00a0LUMEN Publishing House, both in terms of editorial ethics and the ethics of research on human subjects.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">III. SELECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF REVIEWERS<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">LUMEN Publishing\u00a0reviewers\u00a0are scientific and cultural personalities, recognized nationally and internationally with a PhD; in special or exceptional circumstances, having the quality of a PhD. student.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The reviewers\u00a0must have a rich expertise and experience to be chosen as a referent, certified through publications, conferences, grants, etc. and have previously worked for LUMEN Publishing and the LUMEN Research Center in Social and Humanistic Sciences.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"slide-text-bg2\"><span> Procesul de Peer Review I.\u00a0PROCESUL DE PEER REVIEW: STANDARDE SI DESCRIERE I.1.\u00a0EVALUAREA EDITORIALA In primul stadiu al evaluarii,\u00a0lucrarea propusa sp<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"slide-btn-area-sm\"><a href=\"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/5156-2\/selection-process\/\" class=\"slide-btn-sm\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":5156,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5166","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5166","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5166"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5166\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/lumen.international\/ceenashs2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}